Why men have stopped singing in church

  • Worship band in the darkIt happened again yesterday. I attended one of those hip, contemporary churches — and almost no one sang. Worshippers stood obediently as the band rocked out, the smoke machine belched and lights flashed. Lyrics were projected on the screen, but almost no one sang them. A few women were trying, but I saw only one male (other than the worship leader) making the attempt.

    Last month I blogged, “Have Christians Stopped Singing?” I did some research, and learned that congregational singing has ebbed and flowed over the centuries. It reached a high tide when I was a young man – but that tide may be going out again. And that could be bad news for men.

    First, a very quick history of congregational singing.

    Before the Reformation, laypersons were not allowed to sing in church. Sacred music was performed by professionals (priests and cantors), played on complex instruments (pipe organs), and sung in an obscure language (Latin).

    Reformers gave worship back to the people, in the form of congregational singing. They composed simple tunes with lyrics that people could easily memorize. Some of the tunes came out of local taverns.

    A technological advance – the printing press – led to an explosion of congregational singing. The first hymnal was printed in 1532, and soon a few dozen hymns became standards across Christendom. Hymnals slowly grew over the next four centuries. By the mid 20th century every Protestant church had a hymnal of about 1000 songs, 250 of which were regularly sung. In the church of my youth, everyone picked up a hymnal and sang every verse of every song.

    About a decade ago, a new technological advance – the computer controlled projection screen – entered America’s sanctuaries. Suddenly churches could project song lyrics for all to see. Hymnals became obsolete. No longer were Christians limited to 1,000 songs handed down by our elders.

    At first, churches simply projected the songs everyone knew – hymns and a few simple praise songs that had come out of the Jesus Movement. People sang robustly.

    But that began to change about three years ago. Worship leaders brought in new songs each week. They drew from the radio, the Internet, and Worship conferences. Some began composing their own songs, performing them during worship, and selling them on CD after church.

    Years ago, worship leaders used to prepare their flocks when introducing a new song. “We’re going to do a new song for you now. We’ll go through it twice, and then we invite you to join in.”

    That kind of coaching is rare today. Songs get switched out so frequently today that it’s impossible to learn them. People can’t sing songs they’ve never heard. And with no musical notes to follow, how is a person supposed to pick up the tune?

    And so the church has returned to the 14th century. Worshippers stand mute as professional-caliber musicians play complex instruments, and sing in an obscure language. Martin Luther is turning over in his grave.

    What does this mean for men? On the positive side, men no longer feel pressure to sing in church. Men who are poor readers or poor singers no longer have to fumble through hymnals, sing archaic lyrics or read a musical staff.

    But the negatives are huge. Men are doers, and singing was one of the things we used to do together in church. It was a chance to participate. Now, with congregational singing going away, and communion no longer a weekly ordinance, there’s only one avenue left for men to participate in the service – the offering. Is this really the message we want to send to men? Sit there, be quiet, and enjoy the show. And don’t forget to give us money.

    There’s nothing wrong with professionalism and quality in church music.The problem isn’t the rock band, or the lights, or the smoke machine. The key here is familiarity. When that super-hip band performed a hymn, the crowd responded. People sang. Even the men.

    If you liked this article, click on the FACEBOOK icon below and share it with your friends.

    Share:
    • Print
    • Digg
    • del.icio.us
    • Facebook
    • Google Bookmarks
    • email
    • LinkedIn
    • NewsVine
    • Yahoo! Buzz
    • RSS

    February 7th, 2011 | David Murrow | 268 Comments | Tags: , , , , ,

About The Author

David Murrow

David Murrow is the director of Church for Men, an organization that helps congregations reach more men and boys. In his day job, David works as a television producer and writer. He's the author of three books. He lives in Alaska with his wife, three children, two grandchildren and a dachshund named Pepper.

  • Gina101

    I go to Church to praise and adore God, not to enjoy a rock concert or show.

  • SkywalkerJade

    I don’t think that is what Joel was trying to say. He wasn’t saying that God accepts all worship even if it is not true or from the heart. He is saying that there are songs and people that truely do worship with the newer style, just as when hymns came out, the people who had previously only had Latin songs, that others sang for them, were probably against hymns. He’s trying to open your mind to the different ways people worship. Look at Genesis 4:7′ it wasn’t about the offering being from the harvest or an offering of blood (sheep), but wether it was from the heart, the best they had to offer. God talks of percentages, not numbers. That’s why Jesus said the woman who gave a small coin was giving more than anyone else (Mark 12:43-44).

    I’ve seen large groups of people worship whole-heartedly at a “rock-show” worship event. Obviously if it’s a show and the congregation isn’t worshipping, then it is just a show and that needs to change, but if people are worshipping truely, then who are we to say they are worshipping wrong? Granted, when I see these “rock-show” worship times be truely worshipful, it’s full of and usually led by 18-27 year old people. It’s a different mindset than people who grew up with hymns.

    I’m also not saying that hymns are bad or that older people are wrong for not liking new music. Just that if people are worshipping truely, then there is value in that. Maybe not to you or someone else who doesn’t get into newer styles, but understand that each person is viewed from their own heart by God, who are we to judge the way they worship. (Keep in mind, I said “worship” not “stand there not singing or caring.” I think the writer of this article had a good point.)

  • Pingback: Monday’s Links To Go | Tim Archer's Kitchen of Half-Baked Thoughts

  • Steve McLeod

    Thanks for the observations, David. I sing on the praise team at church, but have noticed that when I visit other churches I often do not know the songs. While there could be other reasons for it as well (e.g., difference in church backgrounds and hymnody), if this reflects a larger trend intentionally toward professional performance rather than congregational singing, it is quite sad.

  • http://www.facebook.com/josh.coate Josh Coate

    All of this discussion over methodology? Really, church? The Lord desires a broken heart and a contrite spirit, not a certain style of words or lyrics. But
    the hour is coming, and now is, when the true worshipers will worship
    the Father in spirit and truth; for the Father is seeking such to
    worship Him. God is Spirit, and those who worship Him must worship in spirit and truth. He looks at our hearts – they shine brighter than any light show, sing louder than any amplifier, ring truer than any verse or chorus. It is the condition of the heart that comes to worship, not the band. It’s not about what we prefer, it’s about King Jesus.

  • http://conthis.blogspot.com Joe Sewell

    There are way too many issues with church singing (I refuse to call it “worship,” since it’s all worship!) beyond just not knowing the song. Church music has declined to being a major concert or some guy barely vocalizing over an underamplified guitar. Neither one really encourages audience participation.

    I actually had to leave a church because the music was too loud. The music drowned out the lyrics, as well as the congregation singing. That makes the whole thing worthless. It was worse for me, as I have sensitive hearing; I wound up with a headache from the high notes ringing in my head, and nausea from the pounding bass. Just the thing to encourage prayerful worship. What I noticed, though, is that people gave up trying to sing over the music, because it was so loud.

    In another situation, the worship leader sang out, again a bit too loud for my tastes (but this building wasn’t built for optimized acoustics, so I found a place where I could minimize any headaches with 32dB earplugs), but he drowned out the backup singers. Excuse me? Much pride there?

    Since this is “Church for Men,” let me also throw in what I’ll call “Chris Tomlin Syndrome.” I used to be a bass in a church choir. A couple of the choir leaders managed to stretch my range into low tenor. Most currently popular worship songs, though, aren’t made for voices like mine. Of course, the classic Southern Gospel tenor need not apply, either, because his voice is almost too loud that high. (Unless he’s the worship leader.) Many, many men cannot go that high, and they don’t have the ear to drop an octave, let alone harmonize (which has also gone bye-bye). I used to get funny looks at the migraine-and-nausea church when I’d kick the melody down 2 octaves, but I was able to sing and, as far as I knew, stayed on key.

  • Kenneth

    I think one of the problems is that many people in the church never listen to worship music outside of the worship service they attend. There are so many things vying for your attention outside of the church service, so you have to purposely commit to listening to God honoring music during the week. It’s good for your relationship with Jesus, your family, and everyone else you encounter. Like the scripture says: “God inhabits the praises of His people”.

  • Kenneth

    Also, I believe in order for people to be drawn into worshiping God, the songs need to be directed towards God, speaking of Him and His glory and His goodness and His mercy. Instead of being man centered like so many “worship” songs these days

  • http://www.churchformen.com/ David Murrow

    Seventy five percent of the buyers of praise and worship CDs are women.

  • http://www.facebook.com/ashlee.coate.7 Ashlee Coate

    Wonder how many of the church-gowers in the 1500′s smuggled a hymnal home?

  • http://www.facebook.com/michael.berris Michael Berris

    Beyond the important matters you already outlined in your article, there are two others that I think are key. Theology and support.
    1. Theology. The primary songs held important by most stable churches contain a number of key theological truths which are able to be reinforced into the minds of the singers. Knowing what you believe and why you believe it are vital to a vibrant faith, and a good hymn will help plant these truths deep within our psyche. (It is unfortunate that elders of some churches fail to discern and deal with some of the fallacies contained in some modern froth and bubble lyrics, but that’s another issue!)
    2. Support. Many men, myself included, have real difficulty making quality relationships that can be called on in times of difficulty and/or doubt. Certainly the typical church leadership model causes men to hide these from other leaders and is the reason no-one finds out that a pastor has a problem is when they have already left town with the secretary! For myself, the ability to recall so many of the important truths provide me with huge comfort and great support.
    I fear for those who don’t have either the knowledge of their beliefs or the ability to draw on the poetically phrased truths of the good hymns.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1189717685 Jim Vertein

    I beg to differ. When i moved to a new town i looked for a new church, they were all nice except they reminded me of my Grandpas small town church, not what i wanted. i finally found a multi denominational church that had the band, and people were happy and singing, the songs were generally geared to what the sermon was going to be, this was a great set up for the message. when i relocated I found a fantastic church, they run about 2500 people through per service. Yes it is like attending a “rock concert” but with a great Christian element and message, the sermons are fantastic, and people are always singing, some loud and out of tune, but so what they are singing their praises to God. We sing some of the old Hymns with a modern sound so you get the best of both worlds. And as for the young people, well we just confirmed 600 kids, and our Wednesday youth Bible study overflows the church, so the message is working

  • Steve Richie

    AMEN!

  • Ralph Jones

    I agree with the article. Men do not sing anymore. People, not just men, have stopped singing by the thousands simply because of the new, fast, non-musical stuff they are trying to shove down our throats. I still love and sing the old songs that have some meat to them, not this “me, mine, our,” songs. We attend a very large church and this new music has taken over. How sad, another part of our service has been turned over to the younger crowd that does not have any idea about music. If it’s not loud, fast, and smoky, with lots of guitars, drums and the like, it’s not music, they say. I have sung in musical groups and choirs since I was about 5 years old, now I’m 75, but have quit singing because of the lack of good music. It is a shame that music written by Fanny Crosby, P.P. Bliss, and the like has fallen from favor in most of our churches. Possibly we can sing some of the good songs when we “All get to Heaven.”

  • Jim

    I guarantee if you will get out an old two line hymn in 8.8.8.8 that can be sung to Old Hundredth men will sing.

  • Stephen Krogh

    Though you’re right that medieval Christians didn’t sing hymns during Mass (or Divine Liturgy in the East), it seems a bit anachronistic to say that worship was given to the people when hymns were introduced to Protestant liturgies. Not only does it imply that hymns had been taken away from them–they hadn’t–but, more importantly, it implies that worship only happens when singing, which is clearly not the case. The medieval laity did sing hymns, typically in the form of prayers or Psalms, in the vernacular, (they also had access to Bible studies and commentaries, also in the vernacular), but simply didn’t engage in the activity during the liturgy. Thus, they had hymnody, and thereby never lost them.

  • http://www.churchformen.com/ David Murrow

    Thanks for that clarification. Sounds a lot like today – people have access to tons of sacred music, but they don’t sing much in church. They have access to Bible studies and commentaries, but few use them.

  • skatblueeyes

    Most of the “worship songs” aren’t about a broken heart & a contrite spirit.